Risk management involves identifying, assessing, and controlling risks arising from operational factors and making decisions that balance risk and benefits. Within today’s procurement organisation supply chain risk management is a top priority, as firms can lose millions because of supply disruption, cost increments, non-compliance penalties and incidents that cause damage to both: the organizational brand and reputation.
What Research is Telling us
Researchers have calculated that supply chain disruption doubled in priority relative to other enterprise disruptions (approximately half of firms surveyed said they were concerned or extremely concerned about this.).
What is Classified as a Disruption
Procurement leaders define supply disruption as any unforeseen event that may disturb the normal flow of goods and materials in a supply chain. Such disruptions can have significant consequences on operations.
From a longer-term perspective, supply disruptions can negatively affect share prices and a company’s long-term balance sheet. For a purchasing organization, a supply disruption can also mean the inability to meet demand and satisfy its customers.
Supply disruptions are varied and can come from a range of sources, including physical damage at production facilities, natural disasters, strikes and labor disputes, capacity issues, inventory problems, incorrect forecasts and delays.
Risk Classification & Management
Identifying specific risks is a critical first step in any risk control process. Here are a few things we need to consider:
These risks can range from an unexpected or unfavorable change in the FX rate, or extend to the fiscal management of a supplier.
Some examples of financial risks include project and cost overruns, finding the limitation, constructive changes, and missed milestones requiring additional funding. Financial risks also encompass unexpected cost overruns that may be linked to other risk factors such as changes in the scope of work required to successfully complete the activity.
Legal and contractual risks often relate to disputes or different understanding of contractual obligations, or from not meeting the requirements within a given set of terms and conditions. Civil lawsuits, IP theft should also be considered.
In the sourcing process, it is important to evaluate the risk to the environment created by a given supplier or contractor. Environmental risk includes the organization’s impact on natural resources such as: water, air, and soil as a result of discharges, emissions, and other forms of waste.
When the corporate regulatory environment changes in response to a new government or to increasing awareness of changing social conditions, climate etc., many institutions experience difficulty adapting. Sourcing efforts, especially those in low-cost countries, must consider the impact of these changes on the culture and business operations within that environment.
The Human Element
The unknown human element also poses great risk, perhaps most of all.
Often activities are placed in danger by illness or injury or due to the exit of key personnel. Sometimes, it may be the result of bad decision making by people in the forefront of the action.
In addition to these 5 key categories outlined, we should also consider the following: market factors, political climate, regulatory environment, economic circumstances, etc.
Understanding supply chain risk can enable purchasing organizations to take effective immediate actions in response to risks. Risk management should form an integral part of good purchasing and supply practice. Here at Robobai our AI powered procurement technology provides CPO’s with a fully comprehensive suite of features allowing procurement chiefs to manage risk throughout the supply chain from an intelligent intuitive platform.
Under the Modern Slavery Act 2018, large businesses and other entities in the Australian market need to submit annual Modern Slavery Statements to the Australian Government’s Online Register for Modern Slavery Statements.
Businesses across the globe have had a lot on their plates in the 2020s. For some, modern slavery accountability - whether legislated or not - is still perceived as one more onerous regulatory hurdle or box-ticking exercise.